Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
 

This article is part of the supplement: 15th Paediatric Rheumatology European Society (PreS) Congress .

Open AccessPoster presentation

When and how to stop etanercept after successful treatment of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

FHM Prince1, M Twilt1, SCM Simon1, MAJ van Rossum3, W Armbrust4, EPAH Hoppenreijs5, SSM Kamphuis1, M van Santen-Hoeufft6, Y Koopman-Keemink7, N Wulffraat8, R ten Cate2 and LWA van Suijlekom-Smit1

Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands

AMC Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands

UMCG Beatrix Children's Hospital, Groningen, Netherlands

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands

Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands

Hagaziekenhuis Juliana Children's Hospital, Den Haag, Netherlands

Utrecht MC Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, Netherlands

corresponding author email

from 15th Paediatric Rheumatology European Society (PreS) Congress
London, UK. 14–17 September 2008

Pediatric Rheumatology 2008, 6(Suppl 1):P40doi:10.1186/1546-0096-6-S1-P40

The electronic version of this abstract is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.ped-rheum.com/content/6/S1/P40

Published: 15 September 2008

© 2008 Prince et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Objective

The aim of etanercept therapy in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is to achieve disease remission. However, little is known about when or how to stop etanercept when this aim is reached. Our objective was to describe characteristics and disease course of JIA patients who discontinued etanercept because of a sustained good clinical response.

Methods

The "Arthritis and Biologicals in Children" (ABC)-project is the Dutch national register on biologicals in JIA, in which data are collected prospectively. All patients from this register who discontinued etanercept because of a good clinical response were selected. For evaluation of the disease course we used the criteria for clinical remission on medication and off medication by Wallace et al.

Results

Of the 210 patients in the ABC-register, 17 patients discontinued etanercept because of a good clinical response. After discontinuation nine patients (53%), with a mean follow-up of 1.4 years, did not develop a disease flare. They showed a longer mean period of clinical remission on medication (1.9 vs. 0.3 years, p < 0.01) and used etanercept longer (3.7 vs. 2.4 years, p = 0.16) compared to patients who flared. Three out of the 17 patients discontinued etanercept instantaneously and flared within one year, all other patients tapered the etanercept dose before discontinuation. All seven patients who resumed etanercept use after flaring recovered soon.

Conclusion

Patients who meet the clinical remission criteria on etanercept for a longer period have a better chance of retaining remission after etanercept discontinuation. Tapering of etanercept dose before discontinuation is favourable.

Have something to say? Post a comment on this article!


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.